AMERICAN PARLIAMENTARY DEBATE ASSOCIATION
 

Special Trustee Election Issue
Table of Contents
  Bo Missonis, Fordham University

Bo Missonis, Fordham University
  Greetings APDA,
My name is Bo Missonis and I am running for a Trusteeship. Although you have probably seen me around at numerous tournaments through your debate careers, a majority of you were not even on the circuit when I graduated. I hope to use this statement as an opportunity to introduce myself and describe my hopes for this position and APDA's future.

My Background
I began debating for Fordham University in 1994. Over the next four years, I had a very successful and busy debating career. I have always been extremely committed to debate, missing a total of four debate weekends in my first three years including debating in Canadian summer tournaments. I served as President of a very successful Fordham team for three years (during this period the team broke at World's twice, North Ams twice, and Nat's twice). I have competed in three World Championships and judged at two (missing the break as a competitor by one point twice, breaking as the top ranked American judge at Glasgow this year). I was elected to serve on the APDA board my senior year, running the World's Prep tournament and taking part in the World Council meetings in Athens. Most of you know me as a tab person on APDA, as I been involved in tab for (Fordham, Columbia, Nationals, World's Prep, RIC, UMBC, Vassar, Hofstra and Pro-Ams). Even though I graduated three years ago, I still attend 8-10 tournaments a year and can promise that I plan to do so next season. I have spent the last seven years on APDA trying to ensure fair and fun tournaments.

Goals
As far as I can see, the Trustees have been almost a ceremonial positionthus far not significantly influencing your debating lives. Although I agree with the concerns voiced by Jeff Williams over the power of this position during the debate of incorporation, besides being a source of wisdom, I do believe it can be utilized to make benefit APDA in general in three different ways:
A) Better/Fairer Judging- After years in tab,I realize this is a complaint that is constant, and I must admit that I have seen the overall quality and depth of judging has consistently diminished over the past couple of years. The primary reason has been less and less participation by Dinos at tournaments. I would like to see a more organized and concerted effort to inform Dinos of tournaments and getting them out there. This will help tournaments be fairer (more qualified judges and less political decisions as Dino don't need to do favors for friends) and faster (deeper judging pools mean getting tournaments going quicker on Saturday mornings.) As someone who has been around so long and has been so involved I have relationships with debators who we involved in the circuit from 1990. I have attended over four debate weddings and keep in contact we a great deal of old debaters (I know that is pretty sad, but so is my life). Many tell me they are more than willing to come to tournaments but they are never invited. With a more concerted reach out and hug an old debater program, the quality of your debate experience can be enhanced.
B) Fundraising - I remember the big reason we started talking about incorporation when I was on the APDA board was for the purposes of soliciting money from corporations in sponsorship of tournaments. I think that this is another goal that we should strive for to make our tournaments better (food, parties (which need to be better for retention of novices) and trophies). I am in a centralized location (New York) and have experience in fundraising for debate getting Kaplan to sponsor Fordham's tournament while I was there. Also helping to line up sponsorship for our North Am's bid in '97 and Nationals in '99.
C) Expansion- I know that at this year's elections there was a shying away from this issue, as more people want to strengthen retention and the current teams. Helping APDA expand and getting its name out there is another aspect that a Trustee could do. I remember debating at Bucknell, Hofstra, Boston University, UConn and Rutgers. Debating against teams from Randolf-Macon, Haverford, Furman, Lehigh, Carnegie Mellon. APDA has lost a bunch of school which I think hurts in the long run. Along with Jason Weingartner, I helped found the Hofstra team by going out there and doing debate rounds and training people how to run a team. Within one year they hosted a tournament, and within two were selected to host a well run World's Prep tournament. I know the work involved and think that I could help. Also, as a high school Lincoln-Douglas, I see all of these students who are fun to hang around with and intelligent going to colleges who do not have APDA teams, and I think I could use my influence to set up Parliamentary exhibition rounds at some high school tournaments to interest high schoolers in our debate so they would be inclined to start up their own programs in college.
I have had a blast being involved and around the circuit for the last seven years, I got my school to send me to South Africa, Ireland, England, Greece, Scotland, California, and all around Canada for free. I met some of the most interesting and entertaining people I have ever met. Debate has given me so much, that I am always eager to take an opportunity to give anything I can back. If you are still reading this, I would like to thank you for your time.

[ APDA > Clash > Volume IX > Special Trustee Election Issue ]